09 November, 2006

Ballots instead of bullets

I will stand by my earlier statements. The people have spoken. In our democratic republic, differences of opinion are settled by ballots instead of bullets, not torture and intimidation as in Communist countries.

They do not have peace, they do not have freedom.

Extremist Islamo-Facists are racist, even more so than the NAZIs of the 1930s.

The newly elected Democratis will now have to reveal their secret plan to provide for the common defense of our country from those who attacked us on 9/11/01. To those who elected them with ballots, I hope you have some bullets on hand when the Social Democrats fail to defend you from foreign enemies-Al Qaeda and domestic enemies-Gangs. We still have the second amendment to fall back on in case of attack until Chuck tries to take away our guns like they did in New Orleans where the good citizens were exposed to the dark side of our country--roving gangs.

12 Comments:

Anonymous Zsa Zsa said...

Have they got any plans? Other than to be Loud mouthed screaming Socialists?

14.11.06  
Blogger Chief RZ said...

Imis in the morning, 27Nov06: "Do these nitwits at NBC News think this is going to have the impact of when Walter Cronkite came back in Vietnam and said we can't win, and Lyndon Johnson famously said 'well if we've lost Walter Cronkite, we've lost the country?'"

28.11.06  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems to me it was the republiscum in New Orleans who were behind the taking away of guns.
The failure of the Katrina debacle is all on the backs of America's domestic enemy and no matter which way you non-thinkers wish to spin it...it is the republiscum's failure.

22.12.06  
Blogger Chief RZ said...

Anonymous-- I love it when I get a chance to debate on facts.
IT WAS DEMOCRATS WHO INITIATED THE CONFISCATION !

Did you not see, even on CNN the scenes of law abiding citizens, some widows in their 60's having their only means of self defense stripped? Read below:

At the orders of New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, the New Orleans Police, the National Guard, the Oklahoma National Guard, and U.S. Marshals have begun breaking into homes at gunpoint, confiscating their lawfully-owned firearms, and evicting the residents. "No one is allowed to be armed. We're going to take all the guns," says P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police.

Read the rest from this site: http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html

I await your intelligent reply.

24.12.06  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nagin is a Democrat only to win re-election otherwise he is a republiscum and, had been his entire adult life. The US Marshall are under republiscum control...did you for get about the idiot in the White House?
I want to know where the Democrats initiated the confiscation?? Your word is hardly good enough.

In response to your post:

Americans, including us gun-toting libs out west, understand the need to defend the Second Amendment. We have a country full of America haters called republiscum and the time is getting close that that herd is needing to be culled.

What other way would be more effective in dealing with republiscum child sex predators?
Don't forget all those out-of-control christians who want raptured....especially now that the word of their gay-loving and meth-addicted icon went down.....oh, so did another phoney in Denver.

Conservatism....the ideology of sex, drugs and child sex predation.

24.12.06  
Blogger Chief RZ said...

Anonymous. Glad you came back for a debate. I thought when you typed "republiscum" it was a play on words for: Republican Scum, so I replied. Now I am not sure what construct you are attempting to place on your word. The main argument which you appear to make is that somehow Republicans caused the hurricane in New Orleans, were "slow" (one day) to arrive with help and then somehow US Marshalls are Republicans or controlled by them. False on all accounts. READ the link. There were five others with similar facts. "At the orders of New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, the New Orleans Police, the National Guard, the Oklahoma National Guard, and U.S. Marshals have begun breaking into homes at gunpoint, confiscating their lawfully-owned firearms, and evicting the residents. "No one is allowed to be armed. We're going to take all the guns," says P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police." These are quotes to answer your question. This is not my opinion, but stated fact. I can not believe that you have not researched this before making such a statement.

Nagin, New Orleans Still Violate Gun Rights

You cite me a report that says otherwise. The Democratic Governor, the Mayor of NO, ordered this action, but, it is a violation of their State Constitution and the US Constitution. Democrats did this. They are the 'nanny state' people.

Now to the rest of your comments. Most of those you cited are not elected officials. They are private citizens. All have fallen short of the glory of God.

Sex predation? Look at the two homosexuals in congress who are Democrats. Having actual sexual intercourse with underaged boys. NO crime? But if a republican sends an email to a man over the age of 18, WELL. Drugs? Do you really want to go here?

What some sects of Christians believe is their God given, and US Constitutional right. Now........ If they take that belief and fly airplanes into buildings, then we have a problem. Until then, the Indians are free, in my opinion to smoke whatever they want once a year in a religious celebration.

Please, ask a question. Do some homework first.

25.12.06  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.the7thfire.com/child_sexual_abuse/grand_old_pedophiles.htm

http://conservoscum.bloghi.com/2006/10/14/it-s-a-pedo-stampede-log-cabin-on-the-run.html

http://www.evanravitz.com/silence/

Forgot the links....many more if you need them and more yet if you have access to weblaw and/or lexis

25.12.06  
Blogger Chief RZ said...

anonymous sent a along list of "Republicans" who have been accused, or convicted of sex crimes. Many of his examples were "Republican preacher", etc. A person who is a preacher is neither Republican, Democrat nor Independent.

Shall we concentrate on elected legislators and what happens to them after they commit the crime?

"It is interesting to see how the two parties differ in their approach of dealing with sex offenses. The Wall Street Journal ran a story concerning sexual misbehavior by six congressmen over the past three decades: three Democrats and three Republicans.

The three Republicans were: Daniel Crane (Il) who had sex with a17-year-old female page; Donald Lukens (OH) who had sex with 16-year-old girl; and Jon Hinson (MS) who was convicted of sodomy with a federal male employee.

All three Republicans were thrown out by the Republican party or by Republican voters.

The three Democrats were: Gerry Studds (MA) who had sex with a 17-year-old male page and made sexual advances against two others; Melvyn Reynolds (Il) who had sex with a 16-year-old female campaign worker; and Barney Frank (MA) who paid a male prostitute for sex. In addition, Frank's apartment was used as headquarters for a male prostitution ring.

How were the Democrats treated? Melvyn Reynolds went to jail, but was pardoned by President Clinton. Gerry Studds and Barney Frank, both homosexuals, were "reprimanded" by Congress, but both were re-nominated by the Democratic Party and re-elected again and again for 14 years by Democratic voters and given positions of high influence by the Democratic leadership."

This is what I was trying to get to in this case. Anyone and everyone can commit crimes. If I wanted to, I probably could find the same number or more examples that you cited. Some went back 50+ years. The real point is: What consequence did/ do the guilty face? Democrats generally say, "oh, that's OK, no guilt, no blame, we shouldn't discriminate against homosexuals."

I will be glad to debate on substance.

25.12.06  
Blogger Chief RZ said...

anonymous sent a along list of "Republicans" who have been accused, or convicted of sex crimes. Many of his examples were "Republican preacher", etc. A person who is a preacher is neither Republican, Democrat nor Independent.

Shall we concentrate on elected legislators and what happens to them after they commit the crime?

"It is interesting to see how the two parties differ in their approach of dealing with sex offenses. The Wall Street Journal ran a story concerning sexual misbehavior by six congressmen over the past three decades: three Democrats and three Republicans.

The three Republicans were: Daniel Crane (Il) who had sex with a17-year-old female page; Donald Lukens (OH) who had sex with 16-year-old girl; and Jon Hinson (MS) who was convicted of sodomy with a federal male employee.

All three Republicans were thrown out by the Republican party or by Republican voters.

The three Democrats were: Gerry Studds (MA) who had sex with a 17-year-old male page and made sexual advances against two others; Melvyn Reynolds (Il) who had sex with a 16-year-old female campaign worker; and Barney Frank (MA) who paid a male prostitute for sex. In addition, Frank's apartment was used as headquarters for a male prostitution ring.

How were the Democrats treated? Melvyn Reynolds went to jail, but was pardoned by President Clinton. Gerry Studds and Barney Frank, both homosexuals, were "reprimanded" by Congress, but both were re-nominated by the Democratic Party and re-elected again and again for 14 years by Democratic voters and given positions of high influence by the Democratic leadership."

This is what I was trying to get to in this case. Anyone and everyone can commit crimes. If I wanted to, I probably could find the same number or more examples that you cited. Some went back 50+ years. The real point is: What consequence did/ do the guilty face? Democrats generally say, "oh, that's OK, no guilt, no blame, we shouldn't discriminate against homosexuals."

I will be glad to debate on substance.

25.12.06  
Blogger Chief RZ said...

anonymous--I now see where you got the republicanscum from -- looks similar to conservoscum... Is that your blog?

I just checked one of the many people listed. Your reprint would be what I consider "taking points". At least 100 blogs have repeated verbatim what you cut and pasted.

Paul A. Bonacci vs. Lawrence E. King 1999 .. humm.
apparently, Mr. Bonacci waited about 20 years to bring charges. perhaps when Mr. King 'dropped' him. I really don't care to hear about all the gorry details of their affair, but this is hardly an example of a "pedeo stamped".

The point is: What does each party do to discipline those who are convicted?

25.12.06  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmm...short attention span huh?? Delete the list I posted because I hit a nerve?
How many scum were on that list? 50 or more?
The site the links are from are in TN....that ain't very 'West'....keep your head out of the sand...pay attention.
Censorship doesn't make the facts go away.

25.12.06  
Blogger Chief RZ said...

No, anonymous, I have a very long memory, but will not spam false information or falsely accuse people of things they have not done. Yet another example of what "certain people" do. I am not a useful idiot, unlike the 200+ identical posts on the internet.

You have not kept to this subject==Ballots/bullets.
Democrats in power in New Orleans ordered the confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens. For your information, US Marshalls are what are called "classified" employees, not political appointees. They are paid at the GS or other levels and must meet merit hiring regulations.

Democrats re-elected convicted sex offenders.
Republicans did not. This is the point that you have not responded to and that is the crux of my and your argument. Address it or move on to another post.

In just one case that I know of personally, one of the individuals was a Democrat at the time of the alledged "sex offense". I will not be a party to smearing names of people until and unless they are convicted in a court of law. That is why I named this blog: The Truth. You may not be familiar with the meaning.

There is a difference between censorship by a government and keeping lies and deceptions out of the minds of impressionable children and adults.

26.12.06  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home